52 Minutes of Work and 17 Minutes of Rest: This Is the Strange Productivity Routine Everyone Needs to Try in 2025

Amid the boom in productivity apps, the secret is out: cycles of 52 minutes of intense work and 17 minutes of true rest can boost efficiency.

52 minutes of work and 17 minutes of rest
No comments Twitter Flipboard E-mail
javier-lacort

Javier Lacort

Senior Writer

I write long-form content at Xataka about the intersection between technology, business and society. I also host the daily Spanish podcast Loop infinito (Infinite Loop), where we analyze Apple news and put it into perspective. LinkedIn

The obsession with productivity (guilty as charged) has led to a paradox. Technology offers increasingly sophisticated tools to optimize time, but many overlook the simplest strategy: learning to stop.

The 52/17 rule—work for 52 minutes, then rest for 17—emerged from a striking study. In 2014, software company DeskTime analyzed its 10% most productive users, those with the highest efficiency rates.

The study uncovered a specific pattern: these productivity outliers alternated between 52 minutes of intense focus and 17 minutes of complete disconnection.

Beyond the numbers, these are numbers that speak about people:

  • 52 minutes hits the sweet spot. It’s long enough to achieve deep concentration where work flows but short enough to avoid cognitive burnout.
  • The 17-minute rest period provides the minimum time needed for genuine mental recovery—not just checking a smartphone or replying to WhatsApp.

The story took a twist in 2021. During the pandemic, DeskTime repeated the study and found significant changes. Remote work had doubled average work sessions to 112 minutes, with 26-minute breaks. The result? Increased fatigue and a greater need for longer breaks.

Interestingly, just before the pandemic, in early 2020, the work-rest ratio was 80-17, suggesting a gradual shift toward longer work periods that COVID-19 only accelerated.

This paradox defines this era: The harder you try to maximize every minute, the more you need “unproductive” breaks to sustain real productivity.

Comparisons with the Pomodoro Technique (25 minutes of work followed by 5 minutes of rest) are also worth noting. While effective in the 1980s, it seems less suited to today’s intensive work patterns. Some still swear by it, but it may need updating.

Adopting the 52/17 method comes with an implicit acknowledgment: The human brain isn’t a CPU that can run continuously. Rest isn’t a flaw, it’s a feature, an important one.

Rest is invisible work for the brain. Neuroscience confirms that these “downtime” intervals are crucial for consolidating learning, processing information, and recharging focus.

Breaks, if poorly managed, waste time. Breaks with the right timing and length—like 17 minutes—can mean the difference between a productive day and hours spent staring at a screen.

Productivity isn’t about squeezing every second. It’s about respecting natural rhythms to work smarter and better.

Image | Thomas Franke (Unsplash)

Related | Boreout, Explained: Why Being Bored at Work Is Just as Concerning as Being Burned Out

Home o Index